The Powerhouse Museum* is using a mix of user-tagging & Reuters' Open Calais automated tagging system. Automated tagging seems to be getting better and better at identifying entities (people and things). What it cannot do is provide information on how the document is used by readers - which is where user-generated tags are powerful. One focuses on the stuff inside the document and the other focuses on the context outside the document. Both are necessary going forwards.
Thanks: James Robertson
*I don't know Seb Chan in his PHM guise but I do like his work as one of Sydney's best DJs and event promoters.
Showing posts with label metadata. Show all posts
Showing posts with label metadata. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Tag State
Jack has pointed me towards this Thomas van der Wal article on the state of tagging. The more I see it, the more I get interested in tagging. From what I can see, tagging has 3 primary uses:
1. Retrieval
The first and the most obvious. Do it, tag it, lose it, find it. This is primarily a personal activity and it doesn't require that you share your tags with anyone else. Tagging is therefore part of Personal Information Management
2. Sensemaking
So what happens when people share their tags with others? If they have some nifty analytic or visualisation software, it allows us to see what the informationscape of a team, a department, an organisation looks like. The world becomes cloudy. Folksonomies can be created that feedback into official taxonomies. Rather than tell people about ourselves in LinkedIn or Facebook profiles, we can expose ourselves through our tag scapes. Whole new vistas of investigation & deception become possible. Do we tag something because we think it's interesting or because we want to other people to think that we think that it's interesting?
3. Sharing & Flexible Workflow
So MentorNet mashes up with Flickr. The movement of images is facilitated by tagging. Metadata isn't just for finding stuff but making it move, picking it up and dropping it somewhere else. If it's findable, it's mashable. The lowest level of mashability is the level at which we can tag. First page, then image, then pixel.
We don't have the supernatural anymore, just metadata...
1. Retrieval
The first and the most obvious. Do it, tag it, lose it, find it. This is primarily a personal activity and it doesn't require that you share your tags with anyone else. Tagging is therefore part of Personal Information Management
2. Sensemaking
So what happens when people share their tags with others? If they have some nifty analytic or visualisation software, it allows us to see what the informationscape of a team, a department, an organisation looks like. The world becomes cloudy. Folksonomies can be created that feedback into official taxonomies. Rather than tell people about ourselves in LinkedIn or Facebook profiles, we can expose ourselves through our tag scapes. Whole new vistas of investigation & deception become possible. Do we tag something because we think it's interesting or because we want to other people to think that we think that it's interesting?
3. Sharing & Flexible Workflow
So MentorNet mashes up with Flickr. The movement of images is facilitated by tagging. Metadata isn't just for finding stuff but making it move, picking it up and dropping it somewhere else. If it's findable, it's mashable. The lowest level of mashability is the level at which we can tag. First page, then image, then pixel.
We don't have the supernatural anymore, just metadata...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
