The prompter behind the previous online post was some thinking around online communities with a corporate -> consumer focus (which is more about knowledge gathering). This post has been triggered by some conversations I've been having with different groups with more of a professional flavour - i.e. how do you nurture communities in a nascent professional group (either within an organisation or outside it)? This is more about knowledge dissemination.
I'm afraid there's another 2x2 matrix here but bear with me. It assumes that knowledge is unevenly distributed - there are experts and newbies. But it also assumes that even those with only some knowledge can help each other.
- You probably need to start with some face-to-face (or coaching-intensive online) training - a mix of presentations & activities that use a "trad" learning approach. This is be demanding of time but relatively focused.
- A website (with a blog, podcasts & videos) is helpful here. In effect this is your online broadcast system. This will require the building of content.
- Once those newbies are up and running, they need to support each other. Something online helps here (esp. if people aren't co located). It may be a discussion board, an email list, a wiki or even a community tool like Ning. This will require facilitation.
- Those newbies need to meet F2F occasionally to share what they have learned (both good & bad). This should take the form of an unconference like BarCamp - or some similar participatory approach.
The trick is to get these different activities to reinforce each other in a positive feedback loop. Trad education has been good at 1. eLearning made a stab at 2. But those charged with making people smarter need to get their heads around all four to be effective.
1 comment:
Matt - perhaps add some dynamics arrows (a la Cynefin) to the 2x2 as it would make your flows and developments of the communities more clear. And what's with the 2x2's. Can't you branch out and get a 3x2 someday. I know you can do it!
And not sure about broadcast as one of the descriptors - as compared to peer-to-peer. I find broadcast does not match f2f very well. If you are talking networks, then attractor might be an interesting label. Something that draws people towards (rather than thinking of it as just a spriuking function). Alternatively, perhaps a label of one-to-many vs many-to-many down the bottom.
Anyway, thanks for the thought bubble.
Post a Comment